Landing page
Paid review tool
Free submission
Published journal
Five independent AI labs Β· One verdict

Your research,
reviewed by five
AI labs at once.

Avoid desk rejection. Pay for a fast, private report from five leading AI models β€” or submit free and get published on our open-access journal if your work meets the bar.
Reviewer panel
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Claude
Anthropic
84
Accept
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
OpenAI
OpenAI reviewer
78
Revise
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Gemini
Google DeepMind
81
Revise
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³
DeepSeek
DeepSeek AI
76
Revise
πŸ‡«πŸ‡·
Mistral
Mistral AI
79
Revise
Panel consensus
Revise & resubmit Β· 4/5
80/100
Free Β· Public if accepted

Submit to the Journal

Submit at no cost. All five AI reviewers screen your paper. Consensus score β‰₯80 required to reach editorial review. Accepted work published open-access with a citable identifier.
  • βœ“No submission fee
  • βœ“Five-model AI pre-screen
  • βœ“Editorial review in 2–4 weeks
  • βœ“Open-access publication if accepted
  • βœ“Citable APRC identifier assigned
  • βœ•Detailed rejection reports are available through the private review tool
Free to submit

Paid private review

01
Upload & pay. PDF or DOCX, up to 50 MB. One-time payment at checkout.
02
Five models review in parallel. Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Mistral each evaluate independently across 5 dimensions.
03
Consensus report generated. Individual scores and verdicts aggregated into a single downloadable PDF.
04
Revise & submit anywhere. Use detailed feedback to strengthen your manuscript before submitting to any journal.

Free journal submission

01
Submit for free. Fill in your metadata and upload your manuscript file.
02
Five-model AI pre-screen. All five reviewers evaluate the paper. Consensus β‰₯80 required to proceed.
03
Editorial review. Qualifying papers reviewed by our editorial team within 2–4 weeks.
04
Publication. Accepted papers go live open-access with a citable APRC identifier and full panel scores shown publicly.
Private Β· Confidential Β· Never published
Private AI Review Report
Upload your manuscript. Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Mistral review it independently and in parallel. Full report in under 2 minutes. Your paper is permanently deleted after processing.
Upload your manuscript
PDF or DOCX Β· up to 50 MB Β· all disciplines
Sample report β€” what you receive instantly
Mitochondrial dynamics in early-onset Parkinson's disease
28 pages Β· Neuroscience Β· 5 reviewers Β· 94 seconds
Revise & resubmit
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Claude
Anthropic
Methodology85
Clarity80
Ethics65
Citations72
Overall84
Accept
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
OpenAI
Reviewer
Methodology82
Clarity74
Ethics58
Citations70
Overall78
Revise
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Gemini
Google
Methodology83
Clarity77
Ethics63
Citations74
Overall81
Revise
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³
DeepSeek
AI
Methodology79
Clarity71
Ethics55
Citations68
Overall76
Revise
πŸ‡«πŸ‡·
Mistral
AI
Methodology81
Clarity75
Ethics60
Citations71
Overall79
Revise
Panel consensus Β· 4 of 5 reviewers agree
Revise & resubmit
80
βœ“
Methodology
All five reviewers agree the statistical approach is generally appropriate. Sample size and power analysis are adequately reported.
!
Ethics β€” flagged by all five reviewers
Consent procedure for cognitively impaired participants is absent. This must be addressed before resubmission.
!
Citation gaps
Four reviewers independently flagged missing 2023–2024 literature on the PINK1/Parkin pathway.
Editorial recommendation (private)
Revise and resubmit. Core methodology is sound and accepted by the panel majority, but the ethics documentation gap is a blocking issue flagged by all five reviewers.
Strictly confidential. Your manuscript was permanently deleted from our servers after processing and will never be published or shared.
Free to submit Β· Published if accepted
Submit to the Journal
No fee. All five AI reviewers screen your paper. Consensus score β‰₯80 required to proceed to editorial review. Accepted work is published open-access with a citable APRC identifier.
Upload manuscript
PDF or DOCX Β· max 50 MB
How scoring works: Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Mistral each evaluate your manuscript independently. A consensus score β‰₯80 is required to proceed to editorial review. Papers below the threshold receive a brief rejection notice only β€” detailed reports are available through the private review tool.
127
Published papers
14%
Acceptance rate
18
Disciplines
5
AI reviewers per paper
APRC-2026-0041 Β· 14 Apr 2026 Β· Biology
CRISPR-mediated gene silencing in zebrafish neural circuits
J. Nakamura Β· L. Osei Β· M. PΓ©rez
genomicsneuroscience
Claude 91OpenAI 89Gemini 93DeepSeek 88Mistral 90
90
Consensus
Accepted 5/5
APRC-2026-0039 Β· 9 Apr 2026 Β· Environmental Science
Urban heat island attenuation via vertical greenery systems
A. Balogun Β· F. Chen Β· R. Okafor
urbanclimate
Claude 88OpenAI 85Gemini 87DeepSeek 84Mistral 86
86
Consensus
Accepted 5/5